Lesbian Motherhood and Artificial Reproductive Technologies in North America: Race, Gender, Kinship, and the Reproduction of Dominant Narratives
PDF

Keywords

Lesbian
Queer
Motherhood
Artificial Reproductive Technologies
Critical Race Theory
Intersectionality
Biopower

How to Cite

Smith, Z. (2022). Lesbian Motherhood and Artificial Reproductive Technologies in North America: Race, Gender, Kinship, and the Reproduction of Dominant Narratives. Pathways, 3(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways29

Abstract

This paper reviews current ethnographic literature on lesbian motherhood as it relates to artificial reproductive technologies (ART) through intersectional, biopolitical and critical-race frameworks. I argue that white, lesbian intending mothers intersecting identity markers of whiteness and queerness place them in a unique position within ART discourses. ART functions as a biopolitical mechanism which aims to normalize and naturalize privilege in hierarchized power structures, while suggesting that the meanings that it produces are objectively scientific rather than socially constructed. I suggest that ART mechanizes white lesbian women’s insecurities as queer women, nearing the falsified construction of ideal motherhood, by exerting pressure on them to conform and therefore, reproduce dominant reproduction narratives. Simultaneously, I assert that white, lesbian, intending mothers’ positionality could enable critical interrogation into the harmful social stratifications that ART perpetuates based on race, class, ability, and sexuality. In sum, a review of relevant literature is used to posit that women privileged within dominant ART discourses must utilize that privilege to create meaningful change.

https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways29
PDF

References

Chicago Manual. 2020. “Black and White: A Matter of Capitalization. CMOS Shop Talk. https://cmosshop-talk.com/2020/06/22/black-and-white-a-matter-of-capitalization/

CNY Fertility. 2021. “IVF Costs in India—A Cost Comparison the United States.” https://www.cnyfertility.com/ivf-cost-in-india/, accessed June 17, 2022.

Cutas, Daniella, Wyobo Donrop, Tsalling Swierstra, Sjeord Repping, & Guido de Wert. 2014. “Artificial Gametes: perspec-tives of geneticists, ethicists and represent-atives of potential users.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17: 339-345. I 10.1007/s11019-013-9535-8.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1990. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Poli¬tics and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=jour-nals&handle=hein.journals/stflr43&id=1257&men_tab=srchresults.

Cyrus, Kali. 2017. “Multiple Minorities as Multiply Minoritized: Applying the Minority Stress Model to LGBTQ people of color.” Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health (July): 194–202. https://web-s-ebscohost-com.cyber.usask.ca/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=31df55a5-038a-46fd-8894-221e82fbfe98%40redis.

Davis, Dana-Ain. 2020. “Reproducing While Black: The Crisis of Black Maternal Health, Obstetric Racism and Assisted Reproductive Technology.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 11 (November): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.10.001

Fassin, Didier. 2011. “Racialization: How to do Races with Bodies.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embod¬iment. Edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees. 42–434. United Kingdom: Wiley-Black¬well.

Flacks, Diane. 2009. “It Ain’t a Rough Patch, Baby.” In And Baby Makes More: Known Donors, Queer Parents, and Our Unex-pected Families. Edited by Susan Gold-berg and Chloe Brushwood Rose. 100–106. Toronto: Insomniac Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1984a. “Right of Death and Power Over Life.” In The Foucault Reader: Vintage Books Edition. Edited by Paul Rabinow. 258–289. New York: Random House.

Foucault, Michel. 1984b. “The Body of the Condemned.” In The Foucault Reader: Vintage Books Edition. Edited by Paul Rabinow. 170–187. New York: Random House.

Goodrow, Gabrielle. 2019. “Biopower, Disa-bility and Capitalism: Neoliberal Eugenics and the Future of ART Regulation.” Duke journal of Gender Law & Policy 26, no. 2. 137–155. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A652742894/EAIM?u=usaskmain&sid=bookmark-EAIM&xid=c6b44e69.

Herbrand, Cathy. 2018. “Ideals, Negotiations and Gender Roles in Gay and Lesbian Co-Parenting Arrangements.” Anthropology & Medicine 25, no. 3. 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2018.150748.

Hubbs, Nadine. 2014. Rednecks, Queers and Country Music. Berkley: University of California Press.

Laws, Mike. 2020. “Why We Capitalize the “Black” (and Not “White”). Columbia Journalism Review: The Voice of Journal-ism. https://www.cjr.org/analysis/capital-b-black-styleguide.php

Layne, Linda, L. 2013. “‘Creepy,’ ‘Freaky’ and ‘Strange’: How the ‘Uncanny can Illuminate the Experience of Single Moth-ers by Choice and Lesbian Couples Who Buy ‘Dad’”. Journal of Consumer Culture 13, no. 2.140–159. https://doi-org.cyber.usask.ca/10.1177/1469540513482600.

Levine, Phillipa. “Anthropology, Colonialism, and Eugenics.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Edited by Alison Bashford and Philippa Levine. 43-62. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lewin, Ellen. 2016. “Who’s Queer? What’s Queer? Queer Anthropology Through the Lens of Ethnography.” Cultural Anthro-pology 31, no.4. 598-606. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.08.

Lewin, Ellen. 1993. Lesbian Mothers: Accounts of Gender in American Culture. New York: Cornell University Press.

Novia Scotia Government. 2022. Rebate for Fertility Treatments, Surrogacy, and Related Medical Expenses. https://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20220330002. Accessed June 22, 2022.

Pande, Amrita. 2021. ““Mix or Match?”: Transnational Fertility Industry and White Desirability.” Medical Anthropology 40, no. 4. 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.1877289.

Park, Shelley, M. 2013. Mothering Queerly, Queering Motherhood. Albany: State University of New York Press, Albany.

Ryan, Maura and Amanda Moras. 2017. “Race Matters in Lesbian Donor Insemination: Whiteness and Heteronormativity as Co-Constituted Narratives.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 no.4. 579–596. https://web-a-ebscohost-com.cyber.usask.ca/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=8132be69-04e2-4fc4-800a-b4976f29f227%40sdc-v-sessmgr01.

Reed, Sarah, J. Robin Lin Miller, Maria T Valenti & Tina M Timm. 2011. “Good Gay Females and Babies’ Daddies: Black Lesbian Community Norms and the Acceptability of Pregnancy.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 13, no. 7. 751–765. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23047495.

Roberts, Dorothy E. 2009. “Race, Gender and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproduc-tive Dystopia?” Signs 34, no. 4. 783–804. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/597132.

Silver, Lauren, J. 2020. “Queering Reproduc-tive Justice: Memories, Mistakes and Motivations to Transform Kinship.” Feminist Anthropology 1, no. 2: 1–14. DOI: 10.1002/fea2.12019.

Stoler, Anne. 1989. “Making Empire Respect-able: The Politics of Race and Sexual Morality in 20th-Century Colonial Cultures.” American ethnologist 16, no 4. 634-660. https://www.jstor.org/stable/645114.

Tallbear, Kim. 2018. “Making Love and Rela-tions Beyond Settler Sex and Family.” in Making Kin Not Population. Edited by Adele E. Clarke and Donna Haraway. 145–164. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Zoey Smith