Assessing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anthropological Research Methods
PDF

Keywords

anthropological research
fieldwork
virtual ethnography
remote methods
digital methods
COVID-19
sociocultural anthropology

How to Cite

Dempsey, S., Holloway, B., Chambers, K., Hecker, S., Draper, M., Gallant, J., … Joly, T. (2021). Assessing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anthropological Research Methods: An Undergraduate Research Project. Pathways, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways20

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, there is a need to understand how the pandemic has influ­enced anthropological research. This paper presents the results of a research project examining these changes and the challenges anthropologists have faced in carrying out their research methods during the first eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the University of Northern British Columbia in the Fall semester of 2020, undergraduate students led this project and conducted five virtual, semi-structured interviews with socio-cultural anthropologists across Canada, from a variety of career stages and with diverse research approaches. Interview participants described virtual research methods involving a heavy reliance on video conferencing and digitally available resources, benefits and challenges of remote and digital ethnography, changes to immersion and the spatial-temporal aspects of communication, and outcomes of adopting new technologies. The pandemic affected these anthropologists to varying degrees depending on the location of their field site and their career stage. Despite adaptations and challenges, interview participants also offered hopeful commentary on potential long-term changes in the discipline as the pandemic forces anthropologists to rethink the ways in which we conduct our work.

https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways20
PDF

References

Amit, Vered. 2000. “Introduction: Constructing the Field.” In Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, edited by Vered Amit, 1–18. London: Routledge.

Behar, Ruth. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.

Boellstorff, Tom, T. L. Taylor, Celia Pearce, and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of methods. Princeton: Princeton University.

Bonilla, Yarimar. 2020. “Yarimar Bonilla Interview—Doing Ethnography Remotely”. Interview by Sylvia Yanagisako. Centre for Global Ethnography, May 25. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrmm_p9egKc&ab_channel=CenterforGlobalEthnography

Coleman, E. Gabriella. 2010. “Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media.” Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 487–505.

Deakin, Hannah and Kelly Wakefield. 2014. “Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers.” Qualitative Research 14, no. 5: 603–16.

Faubion, James. 2009. “The Ethics of Fieldwork as an Ethics of Connectivity, or The Good Anthropologist (Isn’t What She Used To Be).” In Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology's Method in a Time of Transition, edited by James Faubion and George Marcus, 145–64. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Günel, Gökçe, Saiba Varma, and Chika Watanabe. 2020. "A Manifesto for Patchwork Ethnography." Member Voices, Fieldsights, June 9. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography.

Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. “Discipline and Practice: ‘The Field’ as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology.” In Locations, Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, edited by Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson, 1–46. Berkeley: University— of California Press.

Kozinets, Robert. 2015. Netnography Redefined. 2nd edition. London: Sage.

LeCompte, Margaret D. and Jean J. Schensul. 2010. Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research: An Introduction. Ethnographers Toolkit Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

Pandian, Anand. 2019. A Possible Anthropology: Methods for Uneasy Times. Durham: Duke University Press.

Pink, Sarah, Heather Horst, and John Postill. 2015. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Seitz, Sally. 2016. “Pixilated partnerships: Overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype.” Qualitative Research 16, no. 2: 229–35.

Todd, Zoe. 2018. The Decolonial Turn 2.0: The Reckoning. Anthrodendum, June 15. https://anthrodendum.org/2018/06/15/the-decolonial-turn-2-0-the-reckoning/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Sean Dempsey, Tom Haiworonsky, Bailey Holloway, Kyra Chambers, Shannon Hecker, Ming Draper, Julia Gallant, Jag Kang, Trevor Lamb, Marlee Stewart, Tara Joly