Colonial Continuum


anthropology of tourism
symbolic capital
contact zone
queer Indigenous theory

How to Cite

Ryu, H. (2020). Colonial Continuum: (De)construction of a ‘Canadian Heritage’ at the Fort York National Historic Site. Pathways, 1(1), 1–12.



The Fort York National Historic Site was chosen as the site of research to examine how tourist attractions are constructed through the use of certain images and narratives, which reflect  existing socio-political power dynamics through the processes of selecting and excluding what is represented. Research into media representations of Fort York was first conducted on the websites of Fort York and the City of Toronto on May 15th and May 16th, 2018. Field observations were subsequently conducted at the Fort York National Historic Site on May 20th, 2018, from 3–5 p.m.; May 30th, 2018, from 2–4 p.m.; and June 2nd, 2018, from 3–5 p.m. The analysis illustrates how the social, cultural, and historical constructions of Fort York render Canada and Canadians as conceptually White spaces and bodies, thus reflecting how the Canadian settler state continues to normalize the erasure of Indigenous peoples, communities, identities, and cultures within the contemporary Canadian landscape. Application of queer Indigenous theories then helps to concep­tualize how multiple uninterrupted strands of settler colonialism intersect to form a cohesive but variegated colonial continuum, or the tangible inertia of settler colonialism that self-perpetuates colonial heteronormativity. Queer Indigenous theories are thus argued to provide the framework through which colonized peoples can collectively dismantle the colonial continuum.


Benn, Carl. 2020. “A Brief History of Fort York.” Fort York. (accessed May 16, 2018).

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, Edward M. 1994. “Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Critique of Postmodernism.” American Anthropolo-gist (New Series) 96, no. 2 (June): 397–415.

City of Toronto. 2020. “Fort York National Historic Site.” City of Toronto. (accessed May 16, 2018).

Driskill, Qwo-Li, Chris Finely, Brian J. Gilley, and Scott L. Morgensen. 2011. Queer Indigenous Studies: Critical Interventions in Theory, Politics, and Literature. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Fiddes, Jennie. 2014. “Lake Ontario.” First Story Toronto. Last modified April 29, 2014.

Foucault, Michel, Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Sopers. 1980 Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common. 2020. “Home.” Fort York. (accessed May 16, 2018).

Graburn, Nelson H. H. 2004. “Secular Ritual: A General Theory of Tourism.” In Tourists and Tourism: A Reader, edited by Sharon Gmelch, 23–34. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

Grove, Richard. 2002. “Climatic Fears: Colonialism and the History of Environ-mentalism.” Harvard International Review 23, no. 4 (Winter): 50–55.

ISSU (Indigenous Studies Students’ Associa-tion [Formerly Aboriginal Studies Students’ Union]). 2013. “Land Acknowl¬edgement Statement.” University of Toronto.

Jalais, Annu. 2005. “Dwelling on Mori-chjhanpi: When Tigers became ‘Citizens,’ Refugees ‘Tiger-food’.” Economic and Political Weekly 40, no. 17 (April): 1757–1762.

Kim, Claire J. 2015. “Animals, Nature, and the Races of Man.” In Dangerous Crossings, 24–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirtsoglou, Elizabeth, and Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios. 2004. “‘They are Taking Our Culture Away’: Tourism and Cultural Commodification in the Garifuna Community of Roatan.” Critique of Anthropology 24, no. 2 (June): 135–157.

Löfgren, Orvar. 2004. “Narrating the Tourist Experience.” In Tourists and Tourism: A Reader, edited by Sharon Gmelch, 91–108. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

MacCannell, Dean. 1999. The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Berkeley: University of California Press.

McMaster, Gerald. 2007. Double Entendre of Re-enactment. Toronto: Vtape.

Meyer, Manulani A. 2003. “Hawaiian Hermeneutics and the Triangulation of Meaning: Gross, Subtle, Casual.” Social Justice 30, no. 4 (94): 54-63.

Muñoz, José E. 1999. Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nadasdy, Paul. 2014. Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge, and Aboriginal-State Relations in the Southwest Yukon. UBC Press.

Pratt, Mary L. 1992. “Introduction.” In Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Trans-culturation, 1–11. New York: Routledge.

Schwenkel, Christina. 2006. “Recombinant History: Transnational Practices of Memory and Knowledge Production in Contemporary Vietnam.” Cultural Anthropology 21, no. 1 (February): 3–30.

Smith, Andrea. 2010. “Queer Theory and Native Studies: The Heteronormativity of Settler Colonialism.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 16, no. 1–2: 41–68.

Soper, Kate. 2009. “Unnatural Times? The Social Imaginary and the Future of Nature.” Sociological Review 57, no. 2 (October): 222–235.

Temprano, Victor G. 2020. “Native-land.”

Urry, John. 1990. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

Warrior, Robert. 1994. Tribal Secrets: Recov-ering American Indian intellectual tradi-tions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Weber, Max, Hans Gerth, and C. Wright Mills. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Heeho Ryu